Two-Way Lora Signal Booster Comparisons
Comparison to Uputronix Preamp
I then simply swapped out the LoRa preamp for the Uputronix.
The result was about a 20dB gain.
The spec sheet shows a bandwidth with a gain of about 19-20db from 427-452 mhz, so LoRa at 433 mhz would fit comfortably inside the bandpass filter, even at maximum (500khz) bandwidth.
From the Uputronix data sheet.
So, the Uputronix, at 20db of gain, seems dead-on spec.
Generic eBay preamp
So, finally, I attached the generic "eBay special" preamp I purchased years ago. It claims 30db of gain. I powered it with 9 volts.
Sure 'nuff, the gain was about 28db.
Conclusions
The two-way LoRa signal booster performed the most poorly, with only about 11db of gain. That said, it has a place in applications where you want gain on LoRa output, as it's a bi-directional amplifier. However, for TinyGS, where we are receive-only, it appears to be the poorest performer.
The Uputronix preamp performed precisely on spec, delivering about 20db of preamplification. That said, I have seen poor performance with it, compared to the generic eBay preamp. I will note that the uputronix is designed to work with bias-T or USB input power. Is it possible that, when powered by USB, it's back-feeding DC into the LoRa board, and the LoRa board doesn't filter it out? I'm not sure.
El-cheapo for the win. The $12 eBay preamp board showed a gain of about 30db. It is the best-performing on my home TinyGS station. I'm honestly shocked, as I expected the 30db preamp, with no filtering, to be filling the LoRa board with noise. Apparently, the LoRa board doesn't mind.
Future Experiments
I might want to investigate whether the Uputronix board is back-feeding DC to the LoRa board. I really don't understand why the LoRa board basically goes deaf with the Uputronix.
No comments:
Post a Comment