High Altitude Balloon flight
Having modified a camera and built a controller, I wanted to fly it to see how the camera worked. I assembled the payload into a foam box and rigged it up with a parachute.
Photos of the launch
Are available in this album
Payload parameters
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Payload mass | 650 g |
Parachute | 30" octagonal (corner to corner) |
Estimated Descent Rate | 5.91 m/s (using Hexaagonal) |
Flight prediction input
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Location | Set with map to the Hamfest venue |
Launch Altitude | Unset (0) |
Launch Time | 15:00 |
Launch Date | 6/3/2017 |
Ascent Rate | Initially set to 5.5 m/sec. Predictor overwrote it to 6.3. |
Burst Altitude | Left to default at 30,000. Predictor over wrote it |
Descent Rate | 6.0 m/sec |
Burst Calculator | |
Payload Mass | 650g |
Balloon | Kaymont 1200 |
Target Ascent Rate | 5.5 m/sec |
Advanced | |
Gas | Hydrogen |
Flight prediction Output and Actuals
Parameter | Predicted Value | Actual Value |
---|---|---|
Burst Altitude | 34315 m | 33880 |
Time to burst | 93 m | 88 m |
Ascent Rate | 6.12 m/sec | 6.388 m/sec |
Launch Volume | 103.8 cu ft | 103.8 cu ft (est) |
Descent Rate | 5.91 m/sec | 10.12 overall 3.2 m/sec last 2000 feet |
Descent Time | 133 m | 143 m |
Flight path comparison
The flight followed the prediction almost exactly! It landed 10.24 miles further SSE than predicted. The parachute performed very well. I need to re-measure it to assure it's a 30" (and not 36") chute. That might explain the discrepancy. NB: I measured it. Yup, it was a 36" chute. That explains a lot!
Temperature data
Charts in aprs.fi showed the internal tracker bottoming out about -39 degrees celsius, and the external tracker at -42c. I didn't work really hard on taping up the box, but it seems that such a large open box with a still camera really doesn't have much thermal mass. It'll be interesting to see how that changes when I have a video camera in there on the next flight.
Lessons Learned
- Using a time profile for scheduling the snapshot frequency worked just fine. It was a good way to get more picture density during interesting periods of the flight.
- I need to work on sealing the payload box better to see if I can stabilize the temperatures some. Everything functioned, but I would have preferred the cameras stayed warmer.
- Using the "Landscape" mode on the Kodak Pixpro yielded blurry pictures. I got some great images, but more than 50% were blurry. I'm going to try "Sport" mode next time.
- The camera performed well enough that I have purchased a second one to use as a video mode camera in the payload, and run two at once.
- I need to remeasure the parachute to see if I can sort out the discrepancy in descent rate.
Very Cool! Nice work!
ReplyDeleteExcellent work!!!
ReplyDeleteJust saw this - thanks for doing this at the Hamfest, great job! I was really impressed that you were able to predict the flight so well.
ReplyDelete